sandhinirmocana sutra - profound secrets

7/24/2019 Sandhinirmocana Sutra - Profound Secrets

1/12

Sandhinirmocana Sutra

FRIDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2010

PROFOUND SECRETS

The Sadhinirmocana Stra or the Sutra of the Explanation ofthe Profound Secretsis a Buddhist scripture classified as belonging to the Yogcra or Consciousness-only school of Buddhist thought. This stra was translated from Sanskrit intoChinesefour times, the most complete and reliable of which is typically considered tobe that of Xuanzang.

The Sadhinirmocana Stra is variously romanized as "Sandhinirmocana Sutra" and"Samdhinirmocana Sutra".

Like many early Mahyna scriptures, precise dating for the Sadhinirmocana Stra

is difficult to achieve.Etienne Lamotte believed that the text was assembled fromearlier, independent fragments. Other scholars believe that the apparentlyfragmentary nature of the early versions of the scripture may represent piecemealattempts at translation, rather than a composite origin for the text itself. The earliestforms of the text may date from as early as the 1st or 2nd Century CE. The final formof the text was probably assembled no earlier than the 3rd Century CE, and by the 4thCentury significant commentaries on the text began to be composed by Buddhistscholars, most notably Asaga. The stra was likely composed in Sanskrit in India,but currently exists only in Chinese and Tibetan translations.

The Sadhinirmocana Stra is one of the most important texts of the Yogcratradition, and one of the earliest texts to expound the philosophy of Consciousness-only. Divided into ten sections, the stra presents itself as a series of dialoguesbetween the Buddha and various bodhisattvas. During these dialogues, the Buddhaattempts to clarify disputed meanings present in scriptures of the early Mahynaand the early Buddhist schools thus, the title of the stra, which promises toexpound a teaching that is "completely explicit" and requires no interpretation inorder to be understood.

The first four chapters of the stra discuss the concept of ultimate truth. The fifth andsixth chapters discuss the concept of layavijna or "storehouse consciousness"and the three characteristics of phenomena (trilakana), which refer to the incompleteand absolute truth of various phenomena. Chapter seven outlines a theory of textualinterpretation in light of the Buddha's various teachings, and chapter nine discussesmeditation. The chapter nine is devoted toa discussion of the BodhisattvaPath.

Within the stra, the Buddha describes the teaching that he is presenting as part ofthe Third Turning of the Wheel of Dharma. As such, the Stra is intended to clarifyconfusing or contradictory elements of earlier teachings, presenting a new teachingthat resolves earlier inconsistencies. The Stra affirms that the earlier turnings of thewheelthe teachings of the rvaka Vehicle (rvakayna) and the emptiness(nyat) doctrine adopted by the Mdhyamaka -- represented authentic teachings,but indicates that they were flawed because they required interpretation. Theteachings of the Sadhinirmocana Stra, on the other hand, require no interpretation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattvahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80layavij%C3%B1%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mah%C4%81y%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddhahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattvahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattvahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yog%C4%81c%C4%81rahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asangahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etienne_Lamottehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xuanzanghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness-onlyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness-onlyhttp://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/?m=1http://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/?m=1http://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/?m=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shravakahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattvahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhisattvahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mah%C4%81y%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xuanzanghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Buddhist_schoolshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yog%C4%81c%C4%81rahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80layavij%C3%B1%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Turnings_of_the_Wheel_of_Dharmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness-onlyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yog%C4%81c%C4%81rahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhyamakahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gautama_Buddhahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etienne_Lamottehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asangahttp://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/?m=1


2/12


3/12

to be matter and from another a mind. However, what we call the mental and thematerial occurs in a unity of organization. Organization is something dynamic."

In discussing the continuity of mind or awareness in the absence of a self, variouswords and concepts have been employed. "Mindstream" is often used bothcolloquially and in more scholarly discourse, as when Dzogchen Rinpoche writes "[t]he Buddhadharma is a process, one through which we train and tame our ownmindstreams. One approach is to go to the root of what we mean by 'I,' our sense ofself or individual self-identity." According to scholar Wiliam Waldron, "IndianBuddhists see the 'evolution' of mind i[n] terms of the continuity of individual mind-streams from one lifetime to the next, with karma as the basic causal mechanismwhereby transformations are transmitted from one life to the next."

This clear evocation of what later became canonized in Buddhist discourse as middleway (Mdhyamaka) is key to tendering a description of the ineffable mysteriummagnum of the "great continuum" that is rendered in English as "mindstream": thenondualinterpenetration of tman and antman. This 'interpenetration' or'coalescence' (Wylie: zung-'jug Sanskrit: yuganaddha) is just a conceptual formation.Technically, the mindstream is subject to Buddha's fourfold reasoning, developed byNrgjuna and known as thecatukoti, though the mindstream secures itsnomenclature from the fourth pada: "neither one nor many" , as this historically is thepreferred subtle reification, but reification nonetheless.

Scholar Caroline Augusta Foley Rhys Davids (1903: pp. 587588) assesses Louis deLa Valle-Poussin's work on "mindstream" in Buddhism:

Professor de la Vallee Poussin finds a very positive evolution of vijnana-theory in certain Sanskrit-Buddhist texts. The term samtana is joined to or

substituted for it a term which seems to approximate to our ownneopsychological concept of mind as a 'continuum' or flux. And he infersfrom certain contexts that this vijnana-samtana was regarded, not as onepermanent, unchanging, transmigrating entity, as the soul was in theatman-theory, but as an "essential series of individual and momentaryconsciousnesses," forming a "procession vivace et autonome." Byautonomous he means independent of physical processes. According tothis view the upspringing of a new vijnana at conception, as the effect ofthe preceding last vijnana of some expiring person, represents no change

in kind, but only, to put it so, of degree. The vijnana is but a recurringseries, not a transferred entity or principle. Hence it is more correct, if lessconvenient, to speak, not of vijnana, but of the samtana of pravrtti-vijnanani.

In Vajrayna (tantric Buddhism) "mindstream" may be understood as an upyametaphor for the nonlocal, atemporal stream of moments or "quanta ofconsciousness" (Sanskrit: bindu). It proceeds endlessly in a lifetime, in betweenlifetimes (Tibetan: bardo), from lifetime to lifetime, prior to engagement in the wheelof life, through samsara and beyond. It does so as an inclusive "continuum" rather

than an individuated, separate, or discrete perceptual, cognitive, or experientialentity, as in the Buddhadharma conception of the tman which is diametricallyopposed to the Atman of the Upanishads.

In the entwined Dzogchen traditions of Bnpo and Nyingmapa, the mindstream
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/atemporalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlocalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80tmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchenhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bardohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upanishadshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhavacakrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An%C4%81tmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_(theory)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up%C4%81yahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catu%E1%B9%A3kotihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyingmapahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binduhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajrayanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80tmanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Augusta_Foley_Rhys_Davidshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_La_Vall%C3%A9e-Poussinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_philosophy#Interpenetrationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nargajunahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%B6npohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondualhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousnesshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsarahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysterium_Magnumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neither_one_nor_many_(gcig_du_%27bral_ba%27i_gtan_tshigs)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen_Rinpochehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhyamaka


4/12

constitutes a continuum of gankyil composed of the five pure lights of the fivewisdoms which unite the trikya. These tantric correlations (or "twilight language")are evident in the iconographic representation of the five Jnas and the sapanna-krama of the gankyil and mandala in Dzogchen practice. The "supreme siddhi" or"absolute bodhicitta" of the Dzogchenpa is when the stream of their bodymind(namarupa) is "released" (in nirvana) as the rainbow body.

Citta is often rendered as sems in Tibetan and satna corresponds to rgyud, whichholds the semantic field of "continuum", "stream", and "thread"--Citta-satna istherefore rendered sems rgyud. Interestingly, rgyud is the term that Tibetantranslators employed to render the Sanskrit term "tantra".

Thugs-rgyudis a synonym for sems rgyud--Thugsholds the semantic field: "Buddha-mind", "(enlightened) mind", "mind", "soul", "spirit", "purpose", "intention","unbiased perspective", "spirituality", "responsiveness", "spiritual significance",

"awareness", "primordial (state, experience)", "enlightened mind", "heart", "breast","feelings" and is sometimes a homonym of "citta" (Sanskrit). Thugs-rgyud holdsthesemantic field "wisdom", "transmission", "heart-mind continuum", "mind", "[continuum/ stream of mind]" and "nature of mind."

The Chinese equivalent of Sanskrit citta-satna and Tibetan sems-kyi rgyud("mindstream") isxin xiangxu . According to the Digital Dictionary of Buddhism, xn

xingxmeans "continuance of the mental stream" (from Sanskrit citta-satna orcitta-satati), contrasted with w xingx"no continuity of the mental stream" (from

asatna or asadhi) and sh xingx "stream of consciousness" (from vijna-satna).

This compound combinesxin "heart mind thought conscience core" andxiangxu"succeed each other", with xiang each other one another mutual reciprocal" and

BUDDHIST SCHOLAR ALEXANDER BERZIN USES THE TERM "MENTALCONTINUUM" IN TRANSLATION OF THE TIBETAN SEMS-RGYUD AND SANSKRITSANTNA, WHICH HE DEFINES AS "THE STREAM OF CONTINUITY OF MENTALACTIVITY (MIND, AWARENESS) OF AN INDIVIDUAL BEING, WHICH HAS NOBEGINNING, WHICH CONTINUES EVEN INTO BUDDHAHOOD, AND, ACCORDING TOMAHAYANA, HAS NO END. ACCORDING TO THE HINAYANA TENETS, IT COMES TOAN END WHEN AN ARHAT OR BUDDHA DIES AT THE END OF THE LIFETIME INWHICH THE PERSON ATTAINS LIBERATION OR ENLIGHTENMENT. ALSO CALLED A'MIND-STREAM.'"[11] THE DOCTRINAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE MINDSTREAMCONCEPT IN BUDDHIST TRADITIONS EVOLVED OVER CENTURIES AND VARIES TOSOME EXTENT BY TRADITION.CITTA-SATNA (SANSKRIT) HAS BEEN DEFINED AS "LITERALLY, 'THE STREAMOF MIND,' A GENERAL TERM USED TO INDICATE THE CONTINUITY OF THEPERSONALITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL IN THE ABSENCE OF THE PERMANENTLYABIDING "SELF" (TMAN) THAT BUDDHISM DENIES." CITTAHOLDS THE SEMANTICFIELD OF "THAT WHICH IS CONSCIOUS", "THE ACT OF MENTAL APPREHENSIONKNOWN AS ORDINARY CONSCIOUSNESS", "THE CONVENTIONAL AND RELATIVEMIND/HEART". CITTAHAS TWO ASPECTS: "...ITS TWO ASPECTS ARE ATTENDINGTO AND COLLECTING OF IMPRESSIONS OR TRACES (SANSKRIT: VSAN) CF.VIJNA."[13] SATNA ORSANTNA (SANSKRIT) HOLDS THE SEMANTIC FIELDOF "ETERNAL", "CONTINUUM", "A SERIES OF MOMENTARY EVENTS" OR "LIFE-

STREAM".

Chinese, Korean and Japanese
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83panna-kramahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Jinashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vij%C3%B1%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tantrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight_Languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namarupahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gankyilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Pure_Lightshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasanashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodymindhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodhicittahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Bodyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trikayahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Berzin_(scholar)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Dictionary_of_Buddhismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-dharmafellowship.org-12http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandalahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Wisdomshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-10


5/12

xu or "continue carry on succeed". Thus it means "thoughts succeeding eachother".

Xin xiangxuis pronounced sim sangsokin Koreanand shin szokuin Japanese

The metaphorical use of "stream" to describe mentality is characteristic of but notunique to the Buddhist literature and worldview. In English for example, "stream ofconsciousness"is more familiar than "mindstream".

William James promoted the "stream of consciousness" with its particularnomenclature, some state drawn from Bain (refer following), whilst immersed inBuddhist studies and the accompanying protracted spiritual discipline of vipayan,as related by Wallace (2003):

Buddhologist Roger R. Jackson similarly portrays Buddhist meditation asa type of ritual act (Jackson 1999:231). While such characterizations arecertainly valid for some types of Buddhist meditation, they are profoundly

misleading for the practices of meditative quiescence (samatha) andcontemplative insight (vipasyana), which are the two core modes ofBuddhist meditative training. Techniques of meditative quiescence entailthe rigorous cultivation of attentional stability and vividness, methodshaving a strong bearing on William Jamess psychological theories ofattention (Wallace 1998, 1999a).

There are two entwined mindstreams according to the two truths, the absolute andrelative, that are ultimately non-dualaccording to Atiyoga. One is the divinemindstream of "consciousness" which is engaged in the phowa practice, forexample the other the mindstream of thought and ideation (Tibetan: sem Sanskrit:manas) (vtti-citta).

Gyatso, Jinpaand Wallace(2003: p. 97) identify two kinds of consciousness continuaand associate the most subtle state of consciousness continuum, elsewhereidentified in this article as the "mindstream substrate", with what is known in TibetanBuddhist, Dzogchen and Bonpo discourse as "clear light" (Tib: 'od-gsal):

In Vajrayna Buddhism the subtlest state of consciousness is known asclear light. In terms of categories of consciousness, there is one type of

consciousness that consists of a permanent stream or an unendingcontinuity and there are other forms of consciousness whose continuumcomes to an end. Both these levels of consciousness - one consisting ofan endless continuum and the other of a finite continuum - have amomentary nature. That is to say, they arise from moment to moment, andthey are constantly in a state of flux. So the permanence of the first kind isonly in terms of its continuum. The subtlest consciousness consists ofsuch an eternal continuum, while the streams of the grosser states ofconsciousness do end.

Sogyal Rinpoche (1994: p. 73) frames the importance of the stream metaphor inrelation to meditation and the nature of mind, the objective of a meditative sdhana:

In the ancient meditation instructions, it is said that at the beginning

MENTAL "STREAM" METAPHORS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_of_consciousness_(psychology)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_languagehttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/manashttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sogyal_Rinpochehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vipa%C5%9Byan%C4%81http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphoricalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thupten_Jinpahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-dualhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenzin_Gyatsohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jameshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phowahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atiyogahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Truthshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._Alan_Wallacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%96sel_(yoga)


6/12

thoughts will arrive one on top of another, uninterrupted, like a steepmountain waterfall. Gradually, as you perfect meditation, thoughts becomelike the water in a deep, narrow gorge, then a great river slowly winding itsway down to the sea, and finally the mind becomes like a still and placidocean, ruffled by only the occasional ripple or wave.

Bucknell et al. (1986: pp. 112113) find numerous references to a stream of thought

and imagery:In Buddhist literature the mental condition in which sequences of imageryand verbalizing run on endlessly is often compared to a flowing stream.We find in the oldest section of the Tipiaka the term "stream ofconsciousness" (via-sota). The same metaphor is often found in theTibetan literature. The guru Padma Karpo spoke of "thoughts...followingone after the other as if in a continuous stream"[24] Mipham NamparGyalba observed, the "stream of images flows unbroken" and in the Vowof Mahmudr, there is reference to 'the mind river'. This manner of

speaking is also common at the present day. Tarthang Tlku refers to "thestream of mental images"[27] and 'the flow of thoughts and images' andDavid-Neel, in a discussion of the meditation practices she observed inTibet, speaks of "the continual, swift, flowing stream of thoughts andmental images..."

The term, "stream of consciousness" was coined by the philosopher Alexander Bainin 1855 and later popularized by the psychologist,William James. Bain (1855: p. 380)

wrote, "The concurrence of Sensations in one common stream of consciousness, on the same cerebral highway, enables those of different senses to be associatedas readily as the sensations of the same sense." After originating in psychologicaltheory, the "stream of consciousness" metaphor became more common in Englishusage, and was adapted into different contexts, for instance, the stream ofconsciousness (narrative mode)in literary criticism.

James' classic 1890 Principles of Psychology used several "stream" metaphors .Chapter 9, "The Stream of Thought" describes "the stream of consciousness" asconstantly changing and "sensibly continuous":

Consciousness, then, does not appear to itself chopped up in bits. Suchwords as "chain" or "train" do not describe it fitly as it presents itself in thefirst instance. It is nothing jointed it flows. A "river" or a "stream" are themetaphors by which it is most naturally described. In talking of it hereafter,let us call it the stream of thought, of consciousness, or of subjective life.

"Mental stream" occurs in another context:

The continuous flow of the mental stream is sacrificed, and in its place an

atomism, a brickbat plan of construction, is preached, for the existence ofwhich no good introspective grounds can be brought forward, and out ofwhich presently grow all sorts of paradoxes and contradictions, theheritage of woe of students of the mind.

Psychology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principles_of_Psychologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_of_consciousness_(narrative_mode)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Bainhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-23http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Jameshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-26http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_criticism


7/12

The psychologist Edward B. Titchener (1909: p. 19) used "mind-stream" todifferentiate "mind" from "consciousness":

We shall therefore take mind and consciousness to mean the same thing.But as we have the two different words, and it is convenient to make somedistinction between them, we shall speak of mind when we mean the sum-total of mental processes occurring in the life-time of an individual, and we

shall speak of consciousness when we mean the sum-total of mentalprocesses occurring now, at any given "present" time. Consciousness willthus be a section, a division, of the mind-stream.

Koslowski (2003: p. 67, note 1) states that a suite of worldviews of Indic origin,including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism, are known collectively as'Sanatna traditions'. In the listing of seven notions that are common to the"Sanatna traditions" Koslowski (2003: p. 74) identifies one of the seven principles as

"Santati or Pravha-ekatva" where 'santati' (Sanskrit) denotes "continuum" and'pravha' (Sanskrit) denotes "stream, river" and 'ekatva' (Sanskrit) denotes "onetruth":

Santati or Pravha-ekatva (Continuity of life from the beginning-lesssituation to the end): Process from the beginning-less state to theliberation of life-forms has a causal continuity. This continuity of life-formis terminated only on the attainment of its nature. Each life-form is aninstance of continuum and embodies a unity of process it undergoes. Life-forms are condemned to be possessed with such a continuum except

perhaps in the state of liberation (if your theory demands that). On thedetails of the nature of causal processes underlying continuity, differentsub-traditions differ significantly, but reality of continuity of life-form isacceptable to all the sub-traditions. Formal continuity between one state oflife to the other state of life is accepted irrespective of this or that state. Alllife-forms embody this continuity, but characterization of the continuumand its embodiment differs in the different sub-traditions.

For an understanding of the Buddhist traditions emergent in India and thedevelopment of their various views, it is important to affirm the dialogic forum of the

Abhidharmaas does King:

Buddhist philosophical debate in India took place within an Abhidharmiccontext.

As Chatterji (1931: pp. 206207) states:

Now all the schools of Brahmanic philosophy have posited somepermanent entity, i.e. soul as the cognizer to which cognition is variouslyrelated. The Buddhists have, however, denied the existence of any such

permanent entity. The aggregates of rupa, samjna, samskara, vedana andvijnana,- the first corresponding to what we call material elements and allthe rest to mental elements - are the stuff of which an individual is made.Cognition which is not subservient to any intelligent being, is referred as

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MINDSTREAM DOCTRINE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhidharmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_B._Titchenerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worldviews


8/12

the samjna skandha or the vijnana skandha according as it is determinate(savikalpa) or indeterminate (nirvikalpa). The place of the transcendentalatman is taken by vijnana. It is the continuity of cognition (santana) whichholds together, unifies and synthesizes the fleeting moments of cognitionand seems to give us the notion, though erroneous, of a subject or aknower acquiring knowledge both presentative (nirvikalpa or svalaksana)and representative (savikalpa or samanyalaksana). This is in general the

Buddhist view on the nature of the pramatr or the subject. But there aresome notable points of difference among the various schools.

Karunadasa (1999, 2000) holds that early Buddhism and early Buddhist discourse"often refer to the mutual opposition between two views":

"permanence" or "eternalism" (Pali: sassatavada) also sometimes referred to as"the belief in being" (Pli: bhava-ditti) and"annihilation" or "nihilism" (Pli: ucchadevada) also sometimes referred to as "thebelief in non-being" (Pli: vibhava-ditti).

As Buddha relates to Kaccnagotta in the Kaccnagotta Suttaas rendered in Englishby the Myanmar Piaka Association Editorial Committee (1993: p. 35):

For the most part, Kaccna, sentient beings depend on two kinds of belief -belief that "there is" (things exist) and belief that "there is not" (things donot exist).

Karunadasa (1999) states:

...it is within the framework of the Buddhist critique of sassatavada anducchadavada that the Buddhist doctrines seem to assume theirsignificance. For it is through the demolition of these two world-views thatBuddhism seeks to construct its own world-view. The conclusion is that itwas as a critical response to the mutual opposition between these twoviews that Buddhism emerged as a new faith amidst many other faiths.

Majurmitrastates in the Bodhicittabhavana, a seminal early text ofAti Yoga:

The mental-continuum (citta-santana) is without boundaries or extensionit is not one thing, nor supported by anything.

Mindstream is a conflation subsuming "heartmind" (Sanskrit: bodhi-citta) and"wisdom-mind" (Sanskrit:jna-dharmakya Tibetan: ye-shes chos-sku).

Lusthaus (n.d.) in mapping the development and doctrinal relationships of the storeconsciousness (laya-vijna), Buddha nature(tathgatagarbha), Yogcra, the self(tman), Abhidharma, primordial substrative nature (prakti) and the mindstream

states:Several Yogcra notions basic to the Abhidharma wing [of Yogcra]came under severe attack by other Buddhists, especially the notion oflaya-vijna, which was denounced as something akin to the Hindu

Early Buddhist context

In Yogcra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Buddhismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sassatavadahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C3%B1ju%C5%9Br%C4%ABmitrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bodhicittabhavana&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yog%C4%81c%C4%81rahttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kacc%C4%81nagotta_Sutta&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80laya-vij%C3%B1%C4%81nahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ati_Yogahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tath%C4%81gatagarbhahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhidharmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartmindhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prakritihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%80tman


9/12

notions of tman (permanent, invariant self) and prakti (primordialsubstrative nature from which all mental, emotional and physical thingsevolve). Eventually the critiques became so entrenched that theAbhidharma wing atrophied. By the end of the eighth century it wasecliped by the logico-epistemic tradition [of Yogcra] and by a hybridschool that combined basic Yogcra doctrines with

Tathgatagarbhathought. The logico-epistemological wing in part side-stepped the critique by using the term citta-santna, "mind-stream",instead of laya-vijna, for what amounted to roughly the same idea. Itwas easier to deny that a "stream" represented a reified self. On the otherhand, the Tathgatagarbha hybrid school was no stranger to the charge ofsmuggling notions of selfhood into its doctrines, since, for example, itexplicitly defined the tathgatagarbha as "permanent, pleasurable, self,and pure (nitya,sukha, tman, uddha). Many Tathgatagarbha texts, infact, argue for the acceptance of selfhood (tman) as a sign of higheraccomplishment. The hybrid school attempted to conflate tathgatagarbha

with the laya-vijna.

Capriles (2004: p. 35) defines the consciousness of the base-of-all(Skt.: layavijnaTib.: kun-bzhi rnam-shes) as congruent with the mindstream and mentions vsan,bjas, and tathat:

The consciousness of the base-of-all was not conceived as an immutableabsolute, which is how the Atman of Hinduism is described in agreementwith the Hinayana idea of a succession of instants of knowledge, it wasexplained as a continually changing stream of consciousness (Skt.,

santana Tib., gy), and was said to be the vehicle that carries the karmicimprints (vasanas or bijas) that go from one life to the next. In turn, fromthe standpoint of experience, the consciousness of the base-of-all is anample condition that yogis may find by absorption. Though theconsciousness of the base-of-all is of the nature of thatness (Skt., tathataTib., dezhinnyi) the absolute nature that is the single constituent of allentities this consciousness is also the root of samsara.

The word "atman" is used in tathagatagarbha literature after being defined or re-

qualified in a new, idiosyncratic way. The Buddha-Nature Treatise for exampledefines "self" as the perfection of the antman-pramit. Thus one realizes his or her"true self" by perfecting his or her understanding of the truth of antman.

Dzogchen (2007: p. 84) asserts an unsourced paraphrase or pastiche of a viewattributed to Nagarjuna:

Nagarjuna says that the mindstream of every unenlightened being ispermeated by the heart essence of buddhahood. The fundamental natureof our mindstreams is tathagatagarbha, or buddha nature, the seed andheart essence of an enlightened being. It is this quality that gives us the

capacity to become buddhas.

The view in the direct quotation above is generally attributed to the Yogcra. It isclear that the first sentence in the above quotation holds the position attributed to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anattahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzogchen_Rinpochehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tathatahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alayavijnanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pastichehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogacharahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tathagatagarbhahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagarjunahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C4%ABjahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C4%81san%C4%81


10/12

Ngrjuna. It is unclear whether the latter two sentences in the quotation are also thatof Ngrjuna, or alternatively the position of Dzogchen Rinpoche.

Waldron (2003: p. 178) renders Vasubandhu's Yogacara account from theAbhidharmakoabhya of cyclic causality (bhavacakra), kleaand karma in relationto the mindstream:

...the mind stream (santna) increases gradually by the mental afflictions

(klea) and by actions (karma), and goes again to the next world. In thisway the circle of existence is without beginning."[44][45]

King (1998) holds:

Schmithausen offers a list of twenty uses which the concept ofalayavijnana provided (14 'philosophical' and 6 exegetical) for the early

Yogacarins. Most of these cluster around the explanation of personalcontinuity given the absence of an abiding-self, and providing a linkbetween karmic action and subsequent fruition. The Sautrantika metaphor

of the seed (bija) became central in the case of the latter issue once theVaibhasika conception of the existence of dharmas in past, present andfuture (the sarvastivada position) was rejected. However, as Schmithausenpoints out, although the Sautrantika postulated the notion of a karmic seedto establish causal continuity over time, the Yogacara seems to have feltthat this required the further postulation of a store (alaya) consciousnessas the repository of these seeds. Nevertheless, it is important to note atthis point that the store-consciousness is by no means considered to bean ultimate reality in the works of either Vasubandhu the Yogacarin or

Asanga, as has sometimes been suggested.Dharmakrti (fl. 7th century) wrote a treatise on the nature of the mindstream in hisSubstantiation of Other Mindstreams(Satnntarasiddhi). Ratnakrti (fl. c7-8thcentury), a disciple of Dharmakrti, wrote a work that further developed and refinedthe themes therein, entitled: 'Refutation of Other mindstreams'(Satnntaradusana). He did not refute the tenets of the Satnntarasiddhi butleavened the nature of the issue from an empirical one, that is, where there aremanifold minds cognized by one's experience of others' mental processes attributedthrough the perceived actions of other sentient beingsthat arise in one's continuum

to an absolutist view, where there is only "one mindstream" (ekacitta). Ratnakrti'sargument is that the valid cognition (pramna) of another's mindstream is aninference(anumna), not a direct perception (pratyaka). Moreover, Ratnakrtiintroduced the two truths doctrineas key to the nature of the discussion as inferenceis trafficking with illusiory universals (samanya), the proof of the mindstreams ofothers, whilst empirically valid in relative truth (savtisatya), does not hold ultimatemetaphysical certainty in absolute truth (paramrthasatya).

Dharmakirti held to the doctrine of the mindstream as beginningless and yet alsodiscussed the mindstream as a temporal sequence, and that as there are no true

beginnings, there are no true endings, hence, the "beginningless time" motif that isimperative to understand the mindstream, as Dunne (2004: p. 1) relates:

"Buddhist philosophers often speak of beginninglessness. It is claimedthat the minds of living beings, for example, have no beginning, and that
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-44http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anumanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhavacakrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kle%C5%9Bahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindstream#cite_note-43http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dharmakirtihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_beingshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogacarahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karmahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_truths_doctrinehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhidharmako%C5%9Babh%C4%81%E1%B9%A3yahttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ratnakirti&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasubandhuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pratyaksa&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pramana


11/12

our current [U]niverse is only one in a beginningless cycle of expansionand decay. Some Buddhist thinkers would claim that even the mostmundane task can have no true beginning. That is, if a beginning occurs,there must be some moment, some "now", in which it occurs. For thepresent to exist, however, there must be a past and a future, for whatwould "now" mean if there were no time other than now? And of course, ifthere is a past, then how could now be a beginning? Now should instead

be the end of the past. Each beginning in short, must itself have abeginning."

Though a conceptual mystery, mindstream may be conceived as nonlinear andholistic. The medium and conduitof mindstream is therorspace and is unboundedby temporalityor locality. Welwood (2000) describes it in this way:

If the contents of mind are like pails and buckets floating in a stream, andthe mindstream is like the dynamic flowing of the water, pure awareness islike the water itself in its essential wetness. Sometimes the water is still,

sometimes it is turbulent yet it always remains as it is wet, fluid, watery.In the same way, pure awareness is never confined [n]or disrupted by anymind-state. Therefore, it is the source of liberation and true equanimity.

Welwood (2000) introduces "pure awareness", the essence-qualityof the mindstream,synonymous with natural mind . This is the primordial and principal constitutionalconsciousness of being. It is accessible by, and the point of origin of, all sentientbeings. "Sentient beings" is a technical term in Vajrayna denoting the mindstreamsof all those consciousnesses not yet aware of the emptiness and fullness ofperfection. Welwood (2000) links the mindstream with the three bodies(trikya):

In terms of the Buddhist teaching of the three kayas, we could say that thecontents of consciousness belong to the nirmanakaya, the realm ofmanifest form. The pulsation of the mindstream, with its alternationbetween movement and stillness, belongs to the sambhogakaya, the realmof energy flow. And the larger, open ground of awareness, first discoveredin moments of stillness, is the dharmakaya, the realm of pure being (thething-in-itself), eternally present, spontaneous, and free of entrapment inany form whatsoever.

The Buddhist and Bn teachings of mindstream and heartmind inform one another,as does bodymind. As Chodron (1991) states:

Just as the body is a 'continuity' even though it has parts, the mindstreamor consciousness is also a 'continuity', although it has parts.

Hawter (1995) succinctly relates:

All of our actions lay down imprints on our mindstream which have thepotential to ripen at some time in the future.

This should not imply that the mindstream is linear and only flows one way, but themindstream is understood in the Himalayan tradition to flow all ways, always. ForMorrell (1999):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinearhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporalityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holistichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_(philosophy)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Location_(geography)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heartmindhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trikayahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigpahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodymind_(in_meditation_traditions)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduit_(spiritualism)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%86therhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being


12/12

Home

View web version

KERALA SIGHTS at 10:19 PM

The Mahayanists also contend that the mind forms a continuous, unendingand unbroken mindstream or flow of consciousness, from beginninglesstime and indestructible. Thoughts and feelings in the mindstream areregarded as of supreme importance to Buddhist practice.

Kelzang Gyatso(1708-1757 CE), the 7th Dalai Lamais translated as stating:

[A]ll things in the world and beyond [a]re simply projections of names and

thoughts. Not even the tiniest atom exists by itself, [i]ndependently [or] inits own right.

Therefore, the Universe is the thoughtformof the collective mindstream of all sentientbeings (and there is nothing which is non-sentient pansentience). This pansentienttotality is the great continuum, the "great perfection" or "total completion" ofDzogchen and Ati Yoga where "shin-tu " holds the semantic field of "total","complete", "absolute" and "rnal-'byor " holds the semantic field of "yoga"Sanskrit: "Ati" holds the semantic field "primordial", "original", "first" "yoga" holds

the semantic field "communion", "union").tienne Paul Marie Lamotte (19031983) was a Belgianpriestand Professor of Greekat the Catholic University of Louvain, but was better known as an Indologistand thegreatest authority on Buddhismin the West in his time. He studied under hispioneering compatriot Louis de La Valle-Poussinand was one of the few scholarsfamiliar with all the main Buddhist languages: Pali, Sanskrit, Chineseand Tibetan. In1953, he was awarded the Francqui Prizein Human Sciences.

He is also known for his French translation of the Da zhi du lun, (Sanskrit:Mahprajpramitstra), a text attributed toNgrjuna. Lamotte felt that the text

was most likely composed by an Indian bhikkhufrom the Sarvastivadatradition, wholater became aconvertto MahayanaBuddhism. Lamotte's translation was publishedin five volumes but unfortunately remains incomplete, since his death put an end tohis efforts. In addition to the Da zhi du lun, Lamotte also composed several otherimportant translations from Mahayanasutras, including the Suramgamasamadhisutra, and the Vimalakirtisutra.

Share 0

0 comments:

Post a Comment

KERALA SIGHTS

ABOUT ME
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indologisthttp://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/rnal_'byorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francqui_Prizehttp://void%280%29/http://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/Ati_Yogahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtformhttp://rywiki.tsadra.org/index.php/shin_tuhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pansentiencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Da_zhi_du_lun&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagarjunahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vimalakirtihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgiumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_La_Vall%C3%A9e-Poussinhttp://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/2010/10/profound-secrets.html?m=1http://www.blogger.com/profile/07016684237226050011http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_conversionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalai_Lamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhismhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahayanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentient_beingshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priesthttp://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/?m=1http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Da_zhi_du_lun&action=edit&redlink=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sciencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarvastivadahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit_languagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_University_of_Louvainhttp://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/2010/10/profound-secrets.html?m=0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahayanahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelzang_Gyatso,_7th_Dalai_Lamahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07016684237226050011http://sandhidharm.blogspot.com/2010/10/search-box.html?m=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhikkhuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suramgamasamadhi_sutra

sandhinirmocana sutra - profound secrets

Documents