abhimanyu synopsis
TRANSCRIPT
“Effect of Post-Harvest Treatments and Wrapping Materials on
Ripening, Shelf Life and Post- Harvest Quality of Mango
(Mangifera indica L.) cv. Dashehari.’’ A
Synopsis
Submitted
To
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology,
Meerut
By
Mr. Abhimanyu Kumar Singh
ID. No. 2680
IN PARTIAL
FULFILMENTOF THE DEGREE OF
DOCTOR OF PHYLOSOPHY
IN
HORTICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE
SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL UNIVERSITY
OF AGRICULTURE & TECHNOLOGY,
MEERUT-250110 (UP) INDIA
2
Synopsis of the doctorate research work in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the doctoral degree
1. Name of the student- Abhimanyu Kumar Singh
2. ID.No.- (2680/PG-13)
3. Degree programme- Ph.D. Horticulture
4. Registration year/Batch- 2013-2014
5. Department- Horticulture
6. University– Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut.
7. Name of the advisor/Chairman- Dr.Manoj Kumar Singh (Assistant Professor)
8. Member of the advisory committee:
1) Dr. Satya Prakash
2) Dr. Sunil Malik
3) Dr. Mukesh Kumar
4) Dr. Pooran Chand
Thesis Topic/Title: “Effect of Post-harvest treatments and wrapping materials
on ripening, shelf life and Post- harvest quality of mango (Mangifera indica L)
cv. Dashehari.’’
Introduction: - Mango is recognized as one of the choicest and is well accepted fruit all
over the world and also acknowledged as the king of fruit (Shahjahan et al., 1994). In India
mango is considered to be the best of all indigenous fruits because of its excellent flavour,
attractive fragrance, beautiful shades of colour, delicious taste and nutritional value. Ripe
mango is exceedingly refreshing to eat and is an excellent source of Vitamin-A and C. The
immature and green fruit is used in various ways in curries, pickles and chutneys. Ripe mango
slices and pulp can be preserved and canned for use when the fresh fruit is out of season.
Dashehari variety is most important and popular varieties of north India. The fruit is medium
size (about 150 g in weight), attractive in shape (oblong oval) and colour. The pulp is also soft
and sweet with pleasant flavour. It is very yielder but irregular in bearing. The keeping and
canning quality of the fruit is good. It comes in bearing even after four years of planting. It is
mid-season cultivar, maturing toward the end of June.
The fruits undergo many physiological and biochemical changes that lead to ripening and
senescence. Shelf-life of mango might be extended by stopping or slowing down these
physico-chemical changes. Due to lack of proper preservation technology, the post-harvest
loss of mango due to decay is considerable. To reduce this loss and to increase the shelf-life,
3
efforts are need to develop post-harvest technologies. Recently, (Hassan, 2010) reported that
the post-harvest loss of mango in supply chain was 27%. Hence, adequate measures should be
taken to prolong shelf-life of mangoes. Due to mishandling, inadequate storage or lack of
post-harvest technical knowledge, producers and traders have to face about 27% losses
(Hassan, 2010) and loss of this perishable commodity is estimated up to 320.7 thousandtons
annually with a value of Tk 3,000 lakh in the country (Haq, 2002). India is the second largest
producer of fruits occupies about the area under fruit cultivation is 6982 thousand hectare
with a production of 81285 MT and productivity about 7.2 MT per hectare in India. India
shared about 21.1 % in production of mango next to banana. Total 2500 thousand hectare
cultivated area under the mango cultivation in the country. The production of mango is 18002
thousand MT with productivity of 7.2 MT per hectare. Uttar Pradesh is the largest producer of
mango in the country after the state like Andhra Pradesh. The total area under mango
cultivation in Uttar Pradesh is 274.03 thousand hectare with production of 4386.99 thousand
MT and productivity is about 16.0 MT per hectare (Anonymous 2013). Post harvest handling
is the problem of mango as due to climacteric nature of the fruit. So, post-harvest handling
can play a major role to reduce the losses.
1. JUSTIFICATION & PRACTICAL UTILITY
This work focused on the evaluation and the comparison of difference post-harvest treatments
and wrapping materials to find out the ripening behaviour of mango fruits when stored at
room temperature and to determine the pos-harvest quality as affected by various physical and
chemical treatments. The hypothesis is that if the fruits treated with appropriate method and
concentration of a various physical and chemical treatment prior to storage with appropriate
wrapping materials enhances the ripening of mango and the shelf-life of the fruits can be
extended.
Keeping in view the above facts in mind, the present investigation entitled “Effect of
Post-harvest treatments and wrapping materials on ripening, shelf life and Post- harvest
quality of mango cv. Dashehari” will be carried out at Post Harvest Laboratory, Department
of Horticulture, SVP University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut- 250110 in the year
2014 and 2015, respectively. The following objects shall be achieved during the
experimentation.
4
2. OBJECTIVES:
1. To find out the ripening behaviour of mango cv. Dashehari as affected by different physical,
chemical and wrapping materials.
2. To determined the post-harvest quality as affected by different physical, chemical and
wrapping materials.
3. To find out shelf-life as affected by different physical, chemical and wrapping materials.
3. BRIEF RESEARCH REVIEW
Bhullar et al. (1981) found that the TSS contents of fruits tended to increase with the
maturity and, therefore the highest increased initial TSS contents at harvest. During the
storage period the TSS contents increased up to 9th day on ripening in all stages with all
treatments. The increase in TSS during ripening might be due to the alteration or
transformation in cell wall structure and break down of complex carbohydrates, peptic
substances, hemicelluloses or other polysaccharide into simple sugars and dehydration of
fruits during storage.
Maini et al. (1984) found that the fruits wrapped with different wrappers exhibited
significantly less decay loss in comparison to unwrapped fruits. The least decay (16.4%) was
observed in fruits wrapped in newspaper. Butter paper and Nylon net were next in order of
superiority. Wrapping of polythene sheet proved to be the least effective. The decay incidence
showed progressive increase with increasing period of storage. There was significant
difference among the loss estimated at 15 days of storage.
Khumlert (1992) found that polythene provides a protective covering which slowed
down the rate of respiration and delayed ripening on mango.
Kapse (1993) found that the mango is highly perishable, ripen faster during summer
and unfit for consumption very soon. Pre-cooling of mango is very recent concept in post-
harvest technology but, has a great importance especially in export of mangoes. General aim
of pre-cooling is to remove field heat and slower down the respiration which helps in
minimizing the susceptibility to microbes and reduce water loss and thereby increase shelf-
life. The pre-cooling at 12 and 16 ºC temperature resulted in improving the quality of ripened
fruits and delayed ripening with the extension of shelf-life by about 4 days than control also
completely inhibited the incidence of stem end rot and anthracnose till 13th day of storage
with or without fungicidal treatments in mango cv. Kesar.
5
Koolpluksee et al. (1993) reported that the post-harvest treatments of wrapping
materials manifested highly significant differences in respect of time required for ripening.
White paper treated fruits required maximum time (5.253 days) for ripening among the
treatments followed by brown paper (4.290 days). On the other hand the minimum ripening
time (3.573 days) was need in control treatments.
Kumar and Singh (1993) reported that pre-harvesting sprays of GA3 (50 or 75 ppm)
or ethrel (500 ppm ) brought forward mango (cv. Amrapali ) fruits maturity by 8-11 days and
ripening by 10-14 days as compared to control. It was significantly improved the fruit quality
(TSS content, sugar, ascorbic acid and β- carotene concentration) and reduced the spoilage
losses under storage condition.
Shahjahan et al. (1994) study has got support by different post-harvest treatments
showed highly significant variation in storability of mango. The maximum shelf-life (11.50
days) was observed in brown paper bagged fruits and the closest (11.17 days) of it was
obtained in newspaper bagged fruits whereas minimum shelf-life was found in control
treatment (7.83 days).
Singh and Sharma (1996) recorded that Ethrel 600 ppm treatment improved juice
and total soluble solid content and reduced acidity in grape (cv. Thompson seedless) berries.
Krishnamurthy and Rao, (2001) reported that the post-harvest losses in mango are
about 25 to 30 per cent. This is mainly due to the non availability of commercial low
temperature store houses,lack of cool chain during transport and storage.
Srinivasa et al. (2002) who observed that when fruits were kept in low density
polythene bag showed off-flavour due to fermentation and fungal growth which has
conformity with the present findings. Fruit skin colour as affected by CaNO3 treatments
increased up to 1.5 - 2.5%.
Gautam et al. (2003) found that the change in skin colour from green to yellowish-
green was observed on 6- 8th day, while yellow colour was developed on 10th day with 1.5%
CaNO3. However, light green, greenish-yellow and yellowish-green colour was obtained with
2.0 and 2.5% CaNO3 on 6th, 8th and 10th days.
Hiwale and Singh (2003) found that the more acidity content was recorded in all
treatments on 6th day of storage, while it decreased markedly on 8th and 10th day of storage
respectively. The maximum acidity (0.91, 0.42 and 0.39%) was recorded with fruit covered
with polythene sheet (200 gauge) at all the stages of storage period, while minimum acidity
(0.17%) was found with Bavistin (500 and 750 ppm) on 10th day of storage. It was due to
6
slow rate of degradation in acidity in fruits covered with polyethylene bags reduced
physiological losses in weight and enzymatic activity, thereby slowing the rate of ripening.
Mumzuroglu et al.(2003) reported that the huge amount of important fruits crops are
being spoiled due to prevailing temperature, humidity, inappropriate post-harvest handling as
well as sub-optimal knowledge in the field of post-harvest technology after harvesting. This
spoilage of fruits is attributed to adverse biochemical changes, namely losses of weight owing
to respiration and transpiration, losses of flesh hardness, losses of resistance to different
microbial attack and overall devastating deterioration of carbohydrate, protein, lipid, some
oxidative enzymes, minerals and nutrient status. Minerals play an important role in
physiological function of the body especially in the buildings and regulation process. Mango
is one of the favoured fruits of the country and considered as a good source of vitamins,
proteins, sugars, fat and dietary minerals including calcium, potassium, magnesium, iron and
so many others.
Singh et al. (2003) observed that the organoleptic characters of mango and sapota like
fruit colour, pulp colour and taste showed the highest score in the fruits when treated with
pre-cooling at 8ºC for 8 hours.
Kulkarni et al.(2004) reported that ethrel (500 ppm ) treated mango fruits ripened 8
days with excellent sensory quality attributes, whereas control fruits ripened in 12 days.
Physico-chemical parameters such as TSS, pH, total sugars and total carotenoids showed
increasing trend up to 8 days during ripening.
Patel (2006) reported that the physiological loss in weight in mango could be
decreased by pre-cooling treatment. In the initial period (5th) days of storage, marketable fruit
percentage was significantly more in fruits treated with pre-cooling treatments at 8ºC for 8
hours.
Pandey et al. (2006) found that the application of the wrapping materials influenced
the characteristics of mango fruits during storage at ambient the physiological loss in weight
(PLW) of mango fruits increased in storage period. Minimum weight loss was recorded in
fruits wrapped with newspaper and maximum weight loss was recorded in fruits wrapped
with polythene sheet and control. This may due to higher rate of respiration and transpiration
of fruits on 5, 10 and 15 days after storage.
Singh et al. (2010) an experiment was carried out to assess the effect of various
chemicals and fungicidal treatment on post-harvest quality of mango cv. Amrapali. Ethrel 750
ppm treated fruits showed better results followed by ethrel 500 ppm. Treatment
ethrel+bavistin (750+1000 ppm) were also found to be the significantly superior over control
7
in respect of post-harvest quality of fruit. Based on results of this study, it can be concluded
the ethrel 750 ppm was found to be the most suitable treatments in improving post-harvest
parameters, i.e., specific gravity, moisture loss, decay, acidity, sugar content and sugar acidity
ratio etc.
Malik at el. (2011) reported that the late maturing (En Aug to Mid Sept) Pakistan
mango cv. Sufaid Chausa has high export potential, particularly in neighboring markets of
Iran and China. Some more fruit were also subjected to HWT of 48 degrees C for 60 min with
additional dip of hot carbendazim (40 g/100 Lit.) at 52 degree C for 5 min. Non-treated fruits
were considered as control. Treated fruits were divided into two equal lots and stored at 10
and 12 degrees C (80-85% RH). During storage, fruit peel colour and softness were recorded
on 21, 27 and 32 days, while disease development, physico-chemical and organoleptic
characteristics were assessed at ripe stage. Fruit subjected to HWT (48 degrees C for 60 min.)
with additional treatments of hot carbendazim (40 g/100 Lit.) at 52 degree C for 5 min were
more firm and had higher level of total sugars as compared to the fruit of other treatments.
Among organoleptic characteristics better pulp colour core with better taste, texture and
aroma was recorded in fruit stored at 10 degree C by the taste panel. After that ethylene
treatment and at final day of ripening. Over all open top packaging was found to be more
advantageous as compared to closed top packaging, in both cultivars under low temperature
storage (11 degree C; 80-85% RH).
8
4. TECHNICAL PROGRAMME
S.No. Details of Treatments Treatments
1. Ethrel 500 ppm + Brown paper T1
2. Ethrel 500 ppm + Tissue paper T2
3. Ethrel 500 ppm + Butter paper T3
4. Ethrel 750 ppm +Brown paper T4
5. Ethrel 750 ppm + Tissue paper T5
6 Ethrel 750 ppm + Butter paper T6
7. Ethrel 1000 ppm + Brown paper T7
8. Ethrel 1000 ppm + Tissue paper T8
9. Ethrel 1000 ppm + Butter paper T9
10. Bavistin500 ppm +Brown paper T10
11. Bavistin 500 ppm + Tissue paper T11
12. Bavistin 500 ppm + Butter paper T12
13. Bavistin 1000 ppm + Brown paper T13
14. Bavistin 1000 ppm + Tissue paper T14
15. Bavistin 1000 ppm + Butter paper T15
16. Bavistin 500 ppm + Brown paper T16
17. Bavistin 500 ppm+ Tissue paper T17
18. Bavistin 500 ppm + Butter paper T18
19. Pedicillate fruit 15mm + Brown paper T19
20. Pedicillate fruit 15mm + Tissue paper T20
21. Pedicillate fruit 15mm + Butter paper T21
22. Control T22
1) Design- Completely Randomized Design (CRD)
2) Number of treatments- 22
3) Number of replication- 3
4) Total number of treatments- 66
5) Experimental Materials- Dashehari cv. of mango shall be taken for the experiment in
coming season. Dashehari is a medium season cultivar which is ready to harvested 25 June
onward. Its fruits are small to medium size (150 g.), ovate-oblong, good cropper and have
biennial bearing tendency, peels are readily, somewhat fiber, pulp firm, deep orange red
fibreless. The quality of fruits is good excellent in test, good to table purpose, the mature
9
fruits are harvested in hard green stage and have a consumable life span up to 9 to 11 days at
normal room temperature during transportation to distant markets.
6) Experimental site- Post Harvest Technology Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, SVP
University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut-250110 in fourth coming year, 2014 and
2015, respectively.
OBSERVATION TO BE RECORDED
To find out the effect of post-harvest treatments and wrapping materials on ripening, shelf
life and Post-harvest quality of mango. The following observations shall be taken during in
experimentation.
A. Physical qualitative characters
1. Fruit skin colour
2. Flavour / Aroma
3. Organoleptic test
4. Marketability
5. Moisture loss
6. Decay%
7. Fruit firmness
8. Specific gravity
B. Chemical qualitative characters
1. TSS
2. Sugar content
3. Acidity
4. Sugar / Acidity Ratio
10
References
Anonymous 2013. Indian Horticulture Database, N.H.B. Gurgaon Haryana (India).
Bhullar, J.S.; Khakhar, U.V. and Agnihotri, R.P. 1981. Studies on storage of Kinnow
mandarin. Punjab Hort. J., 21: 27-31.
Gautam, B., S.K. Sarkar and Y.N. Reddy 2003. Effect of post-harvest treatments on shelf-life
and quality of Banganapalli mango. Ind. J. Horticul., 60, 135-139.
Haq, A. 2002. Pasckage for mango production, post-harvest techniques and its export prospects,
Mango Res. Inst. Shajabad. pp: 1- 15.
Hassan, M. K. 2010. A Study to Formulate Policy for Post-harvest Loss Reduction of
fruits and Vegetables and Socio-Economic Uplift of the Stakeholders.P.188 (A Research
Project Funded by USAID and EC, and Jointly implemented by FAO and FPM of the
Ministry of Food and Disaster Management under the National Food Programme
Capacity Strengthening Programme NFPCSP).
Hiwale, S.S. and S.P. Singh 2003. Prolonging shelf-life of guava. Ind. J.Horticul. , 60, 1-9.
Kapse, B. M. 1993. An integrated Approach to post-harvest handling of mango (Mangifera
indica L.). Cultivar Kesar. Ph.D. thesis, G.A.U., S. K. Nagar.
Khumlert, R. 1992. Effect of gibberellic acid (GA3) on some physico-chemical characteristics
of Kheaw and Sawoey mango fruit. College Laguna ( The Phillipines). 95p.
Koolpluksee, M. S. Mesta. And Subhadrabandhu, S. 1993. Effect of modified atmospheres on
quality and chilling injury of Nam Dok Mai mango fruits, Kaset. J. Nat. Sci., 27(2):115-124.
Kulkarni, S.G.; Kudachikar, V.B.; Vasantha, M.S.; Prakash, M.N.K.; Prasad, B.A. and
Ramana, K.V.K 2004. Studies on effect of ethrel dip treatment on the ripening behaviour
of mango variety ‘Neelum’. Journal of Food scienceand Technology Mysore. 41(2):216-
220.
Kumar, P.and Singh, S. 1993. Effect of GA3 and Ethrel on ripening and quality of mango
cv. Amrapali. Horticulture Journal. 6(1):19-23.
Maini, S.B., Diwan, B., Lal, B.B. and Anand, J.C. 1984. Post-harvest management of
apples. Indian J. Hort., 29: 25-26.
Malik, A.J.; Malik, M.S.; Muhammad, A.k.; Rajwana, I.A.; Saleem, B.A.; Rabiahameed
and Mazhar, M.S.; 2011. Performance of hot water phytosanitary treated mangoes for
intended export from Pakistan to Iran and China. International Journal of Agriculture and
Biology.13:5,645-651.
11
Mumzuroglu, O., Karatas, F. and Geekil, H. 2003. The vitamin and selenium contents of
apricot fruit of different varieties cultivated in different geographical regions. Food
Chemistry, 83: 205-12.
Pandey, G., Verma, M.K. and Tripathi, A.N. 2006. Studies on storage behaviour of apple
cultivars. Indian J. Hort., 63: 368-371.
Patel, U.A. 2006. Effect of post-harvest treatments on storage behaviour of hybrid mango
(Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali and Neelphonso. M.Sc.(Agri.) thesis, Navsari
Agricultural University, Navsari, Gujarat.
Shahjahan, M.; Shell, S.; Zaman, M. A. and Sakur, M. A. 1994. Optimization of harvesting
maturities for major mango cultivars in Bangladesh, Bangladesh J. Sci. Res., 12(2):209-215.
Singh, M.K.Malik, S.Kumar,M.and Kumar.A ;( 2010). Effect of various chemical and
fungicidal treatments on post-harvest quality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amarapali.
Annals of Horticulture Vol.:, No.;323-332
Singh, P.V. and Sharma, P.K 1996. Effect of ethrel on ripening and quality of Thompson
seedless grapes. Indian Journal of Horticulture.53(3):202- 205.
Singh, Ram; Dittander, Kumar and Goyal, R. K. 2003. Effect of oil emulsions and pre-
cooling on shelf-life of mango cv. Amarapali. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 32(1&2): 54-55.
Srinivasa, P. C.; Baskaran, R. M.; Ramesh, N. K.; Prashanth, V. H. and Tharanathan, R.
N. 2002. Storage studies of mango packed using biodegradable chitosan film, European
Food Res. Tech., 215(6):504-508.
12
Technical program (year/semester wise) start to thesis completion:-
1st
year (1st
Sem.)
Course Number Subject Credit Hours
STAT- 512 Experimental Design 3
BIOCHEM- 501 Basic Biochemistry 4
APH- 711 Nutrition of Horticultural Crops 4
APH- 790 Thesis Research 2
Total credit-13
1st year (2
ndSem.)
Course Number
Subject
Credit Hours
GP- 610 In situ and Ex situ Conservation of Germplasm 3
APH- 731 Post Harvest Physiology of Horticultural Crops 3
APH-610 Seminar 1
APH- 620 Special Problem 2
APH- 790 Thesis Research 3
Total credit-12
2nd
year (1stSem.)
Course Number Subject Credit Hours
GP- 501 Principles of genetics 3
GP- 503 Principles of plant breeding 3
GP- 510 Breeding for Biotic and Abiotic Stress Resistance 3
APH- 733 Research methods in horticulture 2
APH- 790 Thesis Research 5
Total credit-16
2nd
year (2nd
Sem.)
Course Number Subject Credit Hours
APH- 690 Seminar 1
APH- 790 Thesis Research 6
Total credit-7
13
3rd
year (1st
Sem.)
Course Number Subject Credit Hours
APH- 790 Thesis Research 7
Total credit-7
3rd
year (2nd
Sem.)
Course Number Subject Credit Hours
APH- 790 Thesis Research 7
Total credit-7
(Signature of student)
14
Certificate from advisory committee
Certified that the research work proposed in this synopsis, to be carried out by Mr.
Abhimanyu Kumar Singh, Id. No. 2680 is original and the programme has been critically
examined.
Chairman/ Advisor
(Dr. Manoj Kumar Singh)
Member Member Member Member (Dr. Satya Prakash) (Dr. Sunil Malik) (Dr. Mukesh Kumar) (Dr. Pooran Chand)
Forwarded of the college Dean Forwarded to dean PGS
HOD College Dean
Approved
Dean PGS