sandhya 5

Upload: sandhya-putri-arisanti

Post on 06-Jul-2018

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/17/2019 Sandhya 5

    1/4

    Paediatr Child Health Vol 8 No 2 February 2003 83

    ORIGINAL ARTICLE

    The presence of clinical signs in

    malnourished infants with acutelower respiratory tract infections

    Nafiye Urgancý MD, Tuðçin Polat MD, Nuri Özer MD, Nimet Kayaalp MD

    Clinic of Pediatrics, Þi Þ li Etfal Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence and reprints: Dr Nafiye Urgancý , Dereboyu cad, Cudi Efendi sok. Pinyal apt, No 3/6 Ortaköy-Istanbul, Turkey.

    Telephone +90-212-212-3262, fax +90-216-522-2222, e-mail [email protected]

    N Urganc1, T Polat, N Özer, N Kayaalp. The presence ofclinical signs in malnourished infants with acute lower

    respiratory tract infections. Paediatr Child Health2003;8(2):83-86.

    OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability of respiratory rateand subcostal retractions in diagnosing acute lower respiratory

    tract infection in malnourished children.

    METHODS: One hundred forty-three children with acute lowerrespiratory tract infection were classified according to the Gomez

    classification as normal, mildly, moderately or severely malnour-

    ished. The presence of tachypnea, subcostal retractions and the

    sensitivity of either sign in identifying children with a clinical

    and radiological diagnosis of acute lower respiratory tract infec-

    tion in each of the nutritional categories were evaluated and

    compared.

    RESULTS: According to the Gomez classification, 21 (15%) of 143 subjects were severely malnourished, 40 (28%) were moder-ately malnourished, 38 (26%) were mildly malnourished and 44

    (31%) were well nourished. The mean respiratory rates in sub-

    jects with normal nutrition and in mildly, moderately and severe-

    ly malnourished subjects were 62.6±9.38 breaths/min, 61.3±5.57

    breaths/min, 57.6±11.65 breaths/min and 49.9±9.04 breaths/min,

    respectively. The mean respiratory rate of those with normal

    nutrition was not significantly different from that of those with

    mild malnutrition (P>0.05), but there was a statistically signifi-

    cant difference between the normal subjects and both the moder-

    ately malnourished (P=0.03) and severely malnourished

    (P0.05), but

    subcostal retraction frequencies were significantly lower both in

    moderately (P=0.03) and severely (P

  • 8/17/2019 Sandhya 5

    2/4

    était de 62,6±9,38 respirations/min, de 61,3±5,57 respirations/min, de

    57,6±11,65 respirations/min et de 49,9±9,04 respirations/min. Le rythme

    respiratoire moyen des enfants présentant une nutrition normale n’était

    pas sensiblement différent de celui des enfants présentant une malnutri-

    tion légère (P>0,05), mais on remarquait une différence statistiquement

    importante entre les sujets normaux et tant les sujets modérément malnu-

    tris (P=0,03) que les sujets gravement malnutris (P0,05), mais la fréquence du

    tirage intercostal était sensiblement inférieure à la fois chez les enfants

    modérément malnutris (P=0,03) et chez les enfants gravement malnutris

    (P

  • 8/17/2019 Sandhya 5

    3/4

    than 60 breaths/min in infants younger than two months of 

    age, respiratory rate greater than 50 breaths/min in infantsbetween the ages of two and 12 months and respiratory rategreater than 40 breaths/min in infants older than

    12 months, or the presence of either sign (8,9).Chest x-rays were obtained from all patients, and were

    evaluated by a paediatric radiologist at our hospital who wasblind to the subjects’ clinical histories and the purpose for

    which the x-rays were taken.The sensitivity and specificity of tachypnea, subcostal

    retractions and the presence of either sign in clinical and

    radiological diagnosis of ALRTI were determined in each of the nutritional categories and compared with each other.

    Statistically, the discrete clinical signs between childrenwith different nutritional states were compared by using χ2

    test. Continuous variables were compared by usingStudent’s t test. Analyses were performed using SSPS 10.0for Windows (SSPS Inc, USA).

    RESULTSThe study was completed with 143 subjects (70 boys [49%]

    and 73 girls [51%]) with a median age of 7.8±5.9 months.According to the Gomez classification, 21 (15%) sub-jects were severely malnourished, 40 (28%) were moderate-ly malnourished, 38 (26%) were mildly malnourished and

    44 (31%) were well nourished.The mean respiratory rates in subjects with normal

    nutrition and in mildly, moderately and severely malnour-ished subjects were 62.6±9.38 breaths/min, 61.3±5.57

    breaths/min, 57.6±11.65 breaths/min and 49.9±9.04breaths/min, respectively. The mean respiratory rate of patients with normal nutrition (62.6±9.38 breaths/min)

    was not significantly different from that of those with mildmalnutrition (P>0.05) but there was a statistically signifi-

    cant difference between the normal subjects and both themoderately malnourished (P=0.03) and severely malnour-

    ished (P0.05), but subcostal retraction frequencies were signifi-

    cantly lower both in moderately (P=0.03) and severely(P0.05 32 (0.84) >0.05 35 (0.92) >0.05

    Moderately malnourished 40 30 (0.75) 0.04 27 (0.67) 0.03 32 (0.80) 0.04

    Severely malnourished 21 10 (0.47)

  • 8/17/2019 Sandhya 5

    4/4

    signs for management (8,9). However, the reliability of these clinical findings in malnourished children has not

    been evaluated. The responses of malnourished children toinfections may differ from those of well-nourished children

    (4). In a study conducted in Gambia by Falade et al (5), itwas concluded that the lower limiting values of respiratoryrates in malnourished children with pneumonia must be

    five breaths less per minute than the respiratory rates in

    well-nourished children. In the same study, intercostalretractions were reported to be less in malnourished chil-dren (5).

    In our study, we detected tachypnea-limiting values tobe higher than the values reported by the WHO, only in52% of patients, especially in the severely malnourished

    group. In addition, we did not detect any subcostal retrac-tion in 53% of those cases, as shown in Figure 1, which dis-

    plays the respiration rates per age.We observed that the average respiratory rates in mal-

    nourished children were decreased with respect to thedegree of malnutrition, and this difference was more promi-nent in cases with severe malnutrition. Likewise, subcostal

    retraction was found to be less frequent in cases with severemalnutrition. Coexistance of tachypnea and subcostal

    retractions was also found to be less frequent in severelymalnourished children with ALRTIs.

    We can explain these results by decreased rates of pro-tein synthesis and breakdown, and the consequent loss of 

    muscle power in malnourished children.WHO studies that found the clinical signs of ALRTI to

    be different in malnourished children than in well-nour-

    ished children were found to conflict both with our findings

    and the literature (4,5).Respiratory rates in malnourished children with ALRTIs

    were found to be lower than the limit tachypnea values rec-

    ommended by the WHO, at least in children younger thansix months of age (Figure 1).

    If it is considered that the death rates from pneumonia

    are higher in the first six months of life, especially in devel-oping countries, it is evident that as well as the criteria of 

    the WHO, other criteria must be followed to be able todiagnose ALRTIs, and to provide an efficient and fast treat-

    ment of hypoxia (22).As a result, we consider that, in diagnosing ALRTIs

    especially in cases with malnutrition, supporting criteria

    must be used in addition to the WHO criteria, rather thanchanging the algorithms of the WHO.

    Urgancý et al

    Paediatr Child Health Vol 8 No 2 February 200386

    REFERENCES1. Loweski J. Mortality from acute respiratory infections in children less

    than 5 years of age: Global estimates. World Health Stat Q1986;5:247-52.

    2. Denny F, Loda FA. Acute respiratory infections are the leading causeof death in children in developing countries. Am J Trop Med Hyg1986;35:1-2.

    3. Kirkwood BR, Gove S, Rogers S, Lob-Levyt J, Arthur P,Campbell H. Potential interventions for the prevention of childhoodpneumonia in developing countries: A systematic review. Bull WorldHealth Organ 1995;73:793-8.

    4. Steinhoff MC, Hilder AS, Srilatha VL, Mukarji D. Prevalence of malnutrition in Indian preschool-age children: A survey of wastingand stunting in rural Tamil Nadu. Bull World Health Organ1986;64:457-63.

    5. Falade AG, Tschappeler H, Greenwood BM, Mulholland EK. Use of simple clinical signs to predict pneumonia in young Gambianchildren: The influence of malnutrition. Bull World Health Organ1995;73:299-304.

    6. Sazawal S, Black RE. Meta-analysis of intervention trials on case-management of pneumonia in community settings. Lancet1992;340:528-33.

    7. Garenne M, Ronsmans C, Campbell H. The magnitude of mortalityfrom acute respiratory infections in children under 5 years indeveloping countries. World Health Stat Q 1992;45:180-91.

    8. World Health Organization. Acute respiratory infections in children:Case management in small hospitals in developing countries.Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.

    9. World Health Organization. Technical bases for the WHOrecommendations on the management of pneumonia in children atfirst-level health facilities. Geneva: World Health Organization,1991.

    10. WHO Working Group. Use and interpretation of anthropometricindicators of nutritional status. Bull WHO 1986;64:929-41.

    11. The Wellcome Trust International Working Party. Classification of

    infantile malnutrition. Lancet 1970;ii:302-3.12. Klein J. Bacterial pneumonia. In: Feigin R, Cherry J, eds. Textbook

    of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: WB Saunders,1987:335.

    13. Stansfield SK. Acute respiratory infection in the developing world:Strategies for prevention, treatment and control. Pediatr Infect Dis J1987;6:622-9.

    14. Stidham LG. Emergencies in international child health.Curr Opin Pediatr 1997;9:254-8.

    15. Tomkins A, Watson F. Malnutrition and infection. A review.ACC/SCN State-of-the-Art Series Nutrition Policy Discussion Paper

     No 5. Geneva: World Health Organization 1989:29-40.16. Rivera J, Martorell R. Nutrition, infection and growth. Part II:

    effects of malnutrition on infection and general conclusions.Clin Nutr 1988;7:163-7.

    17. Chandra RK. 1990 McCollum Award Lecture. Nutrition andimmunity: Lessons from the past and new insights into the future.Am J Clin Nutr 1991;53:1087-101.

    18. Arora NS, Rochester DF. Respiratory muscle strength and maximalvoluntary ventilation in undernourished patients. Am Rev RespirDis 1982;126:5-8.

    19. Victora CG, Kirkwood BR, Ashworth A, et al. Potentialinterventions for the prevention of childhood pneumonia indeveloping countries: Improving nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr1999;70:309-20.

    20. Cherian T, Mark C, Steinhoff MC, et al. Clinical signs of acutelower respiratory tract infections in malnourished infants andchildren. Pediatr Infec Dis J 1997;16:490-4.

    21. Tomkins AM, Garlick PJ, Schofield WN, Waterlow JC. Thecombined effects of infection and malnutrition on proteinmetabolism in children. Clin Sci 1983;65:313-24.

    22. Spooner V, Barker J, Tulloch S, et al. Clinical signs and risk factorsassociated with pneumonia in children admitted to Goroka Hospital,Papua New Guinea. J Trop Pediatr 1989;35:295-300.