mepivacaine

1
Reactions 1091 - 4 Mar 2006 Mepivacaine Allergic contact dermatitis: case report A 54-year-old woman developed allergic contact dermatitis from local anaesthesia with mepivacaine and she showed cross-reactivity to lidocaine. She had no history of atopy or allergy. Seven years earlier, the woman had undergone a second session of sclerotherapy on her legs with polidocanol and mepivacaine [dosage not stated]. Two days later, she developed pruritus and a maculopapular rash on her legs. [Patient outcome not stated.] She underwent her next sessions of sclerotherapy without mepivacaine, and they were tolerated well. Six months later, she received a mepivacaine 2% injection [dosage not stated] for surgery and, 2 days later, developed a similar eruption at the injection site; this eruption completely resolved in 7 days without treatment. Skin prick and intradermal tests were performed with mepivacaine 1%, lidocaine 2%, bupivacaine and articaine. Only the intradermal skin test with mepivacaine was positive after 48 hours. Patch testing was positive for mepivacaine 1%, 2% and 3%, and for lidocaine 2%, 5% and 10%, but was negative for bupivacaine, articaine and ropivacaine. A skin biopsy from a positive mepivacaine patch test revealed hyperkeratosis, dermal fibrosis and a lymphocytic infiltrate. Subcutaneous challenges with bupivacaine and articaine were negative, so these two medications were recommended as local anaesthetics suitable for future use. Sanchez-Morillas L, et al. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to mepivacaine with cross-reaction to lidocaine. Contact Dermatitis 53: 352-353, No. 6, Dec 2005 - Spain 801031511 1 Reactions 4 Mar 2006 No. 1091 0114-9954/10/1091-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved

Upload: vantuong

Post on 20-Mar-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mepivacaine

Reactions 1091 - 4 Mar 2006

Mepivacaine

Allergic contact dermatitis: case reportA 54-year-old woman developed allergic contact dermatitis

from local anaesthesia with mepivacaine and she showedcross-reactivity to lidocaine. She had no history of atopy orallergy.

Seven years earlier, the woman had undergone a secondsession of sclerotherapy on her legs with polidocanol andmepivacaine [dosage not stated]. Two days later, shedeveloped pruritus and a maculopapular rash on her legs.[Patient outcome not stated.] She underwent her next sessionsof sclerotherapy without mepivacaine, and they were toleratedwell. Six months later, she received a mepivacaine 2% injection[dosage not stated] for surgery and, 2 days later, developed asimilar eruption at the injection site; this eruption completelyresolved in 7 days without treatment.

Skin prick and intradermal tests were performed withmepivacaine 1%, lidocaine 2%, bupivacaine and articaine.Only the intradermal skin test with mepivacaine was positiveafter 48 hours. Patch testing was positive for mepivacaine 1%,2% and 3%, and for lidocaine 2%, 5% and 10%, but wasnegative for bupivacaine, articaine and ropivacaine. A skinbiopsy from a positive mepivacaine patch test revealedhyperkeratosis, dermal fibrosis and a lymphocytic infiltrate.Subcutaneous challenges with bupivacaine and articaine werenegative, so these two medications were recommended aslocal anaesthetics suitable for future use.Sanchez-Morillas L, et al. Delayed-type hypersensitivity to mepivacaine withcross-reaction to lidocaine. Contact Dermatitis 53: 352-353, No. 6, Dec 2005 -Spain 801031511

1

Reactions 4 Mar 2006 No. 10910114-9954/10/1091-0001/$14.95 Adis © 2010 Springer International Publishing AG. All rights reserved