bupivacaine/ropivacaine/sufentanil

1
Reactions 1358 - 2 Jul 2011 Bupivacaine/ropivacaine/sufentanil Neuromuscular deficits, hypotension and headache following inadvertent intrathecal administration: case report A 30-year-old pregnant woman experienced neuromuscular deficits, hypotension and headache following inadvertent intrathecal administration of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and sufentanil for analgesia during labour. The woman underwent placement of a peridural catheter at the L3/4 level. Placement was impeded by extreme lumbar lordosis and scoliosis, but was successful after three attempts. An aspiration test was unremarkable, and a test dose of 0.5% bupivacaine 1.5mL (7.5mg) was administered. She reported a mild warm feeling in her legs, but no motor block. A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump with ropivacaine 1.5 mg/mL and sufentanil 0.75 µg/mL was then attached, delivering 4mL boluses as needed with 30 minutes lock-off time. Approximately 30 minutes after PCA placement, she activated the first bolus with immediate improvement of labour pain. However, progressive sensation disturbances from the T4 level developed over the next 10 minutes, in addition to motor deficits in her legs and hypotension of 85/60mm Hg; her HR was 97 beats/min. The PCA was immediately discontinued, and the filter was closed. The woman was informed about the risks of intrathecal analgesia, and remained under close observation. After 135 minutes, all her neurological symptoms had resolved. She then received an intrathecal bolus of 0.125% bupivacaine 3mL with sufficient pain relief and minimal impact on motor function or sensibility. No further analgesia was required and she gave birth to a healthy boy. The catheter was removed on postpartal day 1; over the next 48 hours, she developed mild frontal headaches scoring 3/10 on a visual analogue scale. The pain was aggravated by NSAIDs, fluids and bed-rest, and blood patch was performed on postpartal day 3. Her complaints immediately ceased, and she was discharged home the following day. Aust H, et al. Epidural anesthesia in obstetrics: an accidentally placed intrathecal catheter--remove it or use it?. Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 214: 249-51, No. 6, Dec 2010 [German] - Germany 803056414 1 Reactions 2 Jul 2011 No. 1358 0114-9954/10/1358-0001/$14.95 © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved

Upload: lethu

Post on 18-Mar-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bupivacaine/ropivacaine/sufentanil

Reactions 1358 - 2 Jul 2011

Bupivacaine/ropivacaine/sufentanil

Neuromuscular deficits, hypotension andheadache following inadvertent intrathecaladministration: case report

A 30-year-old pregnant woman experiencedneuromuscular deficits, hypotension and headachefollowing inadvertent intrathecal administration ofbupivacaine, ropivacaine and sufentanil for analgesiaduring labour.

The woman underwent placement of a peridural catheterat the L3/4 level. Placement was impeded by extremelumbar lordosis and scoliosis, but was successful afterthree attempts. An aspiration test was unremarkable, and atest dose of 0.5% bupivacaine 1.5mL (7.5mg) wasadministered. She reported a mild warm feeling in her legs,but no motor block. A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA)pump with ropivacaine 1.5 mg/mL and sufentanil0.75 µg/mL was then attached, delivering 4mL boluses asneeded with 30 minutes lock-off time. Approximately30 minutes after PCA placement, she activated the firstbolus with immediate improvement of labour pain.However, progressive sensation disturbances from the T4level developed over the next 10 minutes, in addition tomotor deficits in her legs and hypotension of 85/60mm Hg;her HR was 97 beats/min.

The PCA was immediately discontinued, and the filterwas closed. The woman was informed about the risks ofintrathecal analgesia, and remained under closeobservation. After 135 minutes, all her neurologicalsymptoms had resolved. She then received an intrathecalbolus of 0.125% bupivacaine 3mL with sufficient pain reliefand minimal impact on motor function or sensibility. Nofurther analgesia was required and she gave birth to ahealthy boy. The catheter was removed on postpartalday 1; over the next 48 hours, she developed mild frontalheadaches scoring 3/10 on a visual analogue scale. Thepain was aggravated by NSAIDs, fluids and bed-rest, andblood patch was performed on postpartal day 3. Hercomplaints immediately ceased, and she was dischargedhome the following day.Aust H, et al. Epidural anesthesia in obstetrics: an accidentally placed intrathecalcatheter--remove it or use it?. Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie 214:249-51, No. 6, Dec 2010 [German] - Germany 803056414

1

Reactions 2 Jul 2011 No. 13580114-9954/10/1358-0001/$14.95 © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved