dexamethasone/mepivacaine

1
Reactions 1335 - 22 Jan 2011 S Dexamethasone/mepivacaine Anaphylaxis: case report A 29-year-old woman developed anaphylaxis during epidural nerve block with dexamethasone and mepivacaine for low back pain. The woman, whose history included four uncomplicated surgeries under general and epidural anaesthesia, was scheduled to undergo L4-5 epidural block and lumbar facet block as an outpatient. After confirmation of the epidural space, 0.5% mepivacaine 5mL and dexamethasone 4mg were gradually injected into the epidural space. She reported itchy eyes and a runny nose 15 minutes later, and subsequently developed generalised pruritus. Examination revealed blood congestion of both eyelids, nasal discharge, flushing and multiple hives on her extremities and trunk. Drug-induced anaphylactic shock was suspected, and the woman started receiving Ringer’s lactate and methylprednisolone 22 minutes later. She reported nausea and abdominal pain after another 30 minutes. Her pulse was faint, and BP unmeasurable. Treatment comprised high-volume Ringer’s lactate, ephedrine, epinephrine [adrenaline], chlorphenamine, famotidine, mexiletine and a dopamine infusion. Her systolic BP stabilised after 2.5 hours, and her rash resolved. She was admitted to an ICU. Her nausea resolved after 3 hours, but abdominal pain and pruritus persisted. The following day, 16 hours after the epidural block, she reported breathing difficulties, and began receiving oxygen via a face mask. Dyspnoea resolved on second day after the nerve block, but pruritus remained. Three days after the nerve block, a cardiac ultrasound revealed mildly reduced wall motion, and an ejection fraction of 50%. At that time, she was receiving chlorphenamine, famotidine, and pulses of hydrocortisone and prednisolone. Her symptoms improved, and she was discharged from the ICU 4 days after the intervention. Wall motion had normalised on 1-month follow-up, and her ejection fraction was 75%. Her serum histamine levels had been elevated between 30 minutes and 11 hours post onset, while serum tryptase levels had remained normal. Author comment: We think that the adverse event in the present case was non-immunological anaphylaxis caused by the mepivacaine or dexamethasone used in the epidural block. Konishi R, et al. Anaphylactic reaction to epidural block in an outpatient. Masui. The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 59: 1287-1290, 10 Oct 2010 [Japanese; summarised from a translation.] - Japan 803048481 1 Reactions 22 Jan 2011 No. 1335 0114-9954/10/1335-0001/$14.95 © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved

Upload: dangkiet

Post on 18-Mar-2017

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dexamethasone/mepivacaine

Reactions 1335 - 22 Jan 2011

SDexamethasone/mepivacaine

Anaphylaxis: case reportA 29-year-old woman developed anaphylaxis during

epidural nerve block with dexamethasone and mepivacainefor low back pain.

The woman, whose history included four uncomplicatedsurgeries under general and epidural anaesthesia, wasscheduled to undergo L4-5 epidural block and lumbar facetblock as an outpatient. After confirmation of the epiduralspace, 0.5% mepivacaine 5mL and dexamethasone 4mgwere gradually injected into the epidural space. Shereported itchy eyes and a runny nose 15 minutes later, andsubsequently developed generalised pruritus. Examinationrevealed blood congestion of both eyelids, nasal discharge,flushing and multiple hives on her extremities and trunk.

Drug-induced anaphylactic shock was suspected, andthe woman started receiving Ringer’s lactate andmethylprednisolone 22 minutes later. She reported nauseaand abdominal pain after another 30 minutes. Her pulsewas faint, and BP unmeasurable. Treatment comprisedhigh-volume Ringer’s lactate, ephedrine, epinephrine[adrenaline], chlorphenamine, famotidine, mexiletine and adopamine infusion. Her systolic BP stabilised after2.5 hours, and her rash resolved. She was admitted to anICU. Her nausea resolved after 3 hours, but abdominal painand pruritus persisted. The following day, 16 hours afterthe epidural block, she reported breathing difficulties, andbegan receiving oxygen via a face mask. Dyspnoea resolvedon second day after the nerve block, but pruritus remained.Three days after the nerve block, a cardiac ultrasoundrevealed mildly reduced wall motion, and an ejectionfraction of 50%. At that time, she was receivingchlorphenamine, famotidine, and pulses of hydrocortisoneand prednisolone. Her symptoms improved, and she wasdischarged from the ICU 4 days after the intervention. Wallmotion had normalised on 1-month follow-up, and herejection fraction was 75%. Her serum histamine levels hadbeen elevated between 30 minutes and 11 hours postonset, while serum tryptase levels had remained normal.

Author comment: We think that the adverse event in thepresent case was non-immunological anaphylaxis caused bythe mepivacaine or dexamethasone used in the epiduralblock.Konishi R, et al. Anaphylactic reaction to epidural block in an outpatient. Masui.The Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 59: 1287-1290, 10 Oct 2010 [Japanese;summarised from a translation.] - Japan 803048481

1

Reactions 22 Jan 2011 No. 13350114-9954/10/1335-0001/$14.95 © 2010 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved